MapGraphSeamsCalendarIntroductionDisclosureMethodFor agents and tools

Updated weekly, new versions on Mondays · Corrections: open an issue

Agentic Standards Map

Who is standardising agentic commerce, where, and what they have committed to next.

W3C, IETF, GS1, UN/CEFACT, the Linux Foundation, AAIF, and the industry protocols (UCP, ACP, AP2, x402, Visa, Mastercard) are all working on how an AI agent finds a seller, trusts a product, proves who it acts for and pays. They do it at the same time, at different speeds and with different rules. This map puts them on one page.

Every statement is dated and points to a public source. The map makes no predictions or recommendations of its own and does not rank approaches. Third-party proposals are recorded with attribution and their stated status.

This map documents public standardisation activity, specifications and declared commitments. It does not measure market adoption, transaction volume, cross-protocol interoperability or the reliability of deployed implementations. Implementation claims are reported only where supported by dated public evidence and are not treated as evidence of interoperability.

Version 1.0.1 (2026-10-14) · site updated 2026-10-15. The map is updated as venues move; each entry carries its own read date.

DOI (all versions): 10.5281/zenodo.23357361


Four things you see only when you look across venues

1. The map identifies at least eight discovery mechanisms or publication paths. /.well-known/ucp, A2A's agent-card.json, schema.org, ARD, AI Catalog, MCP Server Cards, DNS-AID and the /.well-known/poppy.json of the Personal Agent Protocol. Of these eight, only agent-card.json is in the IANA well-known registry (updated 2026-10-07, read 2026-10-14). Two venues have discovery-charter work in progress: the IETF DAWN charter is in external review, with comments to the IESG due by 2026-10-19 and an IESG telechat listed for 2026-10-22, and the W3C Agentic Web WG charter is in refinement. Seam S1

2. Product identity: one ratified route and one route marked at risk. GS1 Digital Link gives a ratified route to product identifiers; the DID route cited for Digital Product Passports rests on a feature that the DID Resolution Candidate Recommendation Draft marks at risk. One workshop position statement (#31, Sven Böckelmann) frames the open question as three checks: "Where. Who signed. Who may." Seam S2

3. Agent identity: several protocols reference HTTP Message Signatures or Web Bot Auth. Visa TAP, Mastercard Agent Pay, UCP and x402 build on RFC 9421 or Web Bot Auth. The IETF agentproto charter names webbotauth among the groups to coordinate with, and the draft W3C Agentic Web charter lists it for coordination too. ACP's texts do not mention it (not found in the ACP repository, 2026-10-03). Seam S3

4. Checkout: what each protocol defines differs between the checkout and the events after it. Native AP2 chains a merchant-signed checkout, the user's mandate and a Checkout Receipt that the merchant must return once it accepts or rejects the mandate (docs/ap2/specification.md at commit e1ea56d, read 2026-10-13). The words refund and cancel are not found in the seven AP2 documents of docs/ap2; the goods-return term occurs only as the field return_policy ("30-day returns") in two example checkouts of checkout_mandate.md, and fulfil(l) only as a generic verb, never for the fulfilment of an order (2026-10-14). UCP signs the delivery of order webhooks (RFC 9421) and ACP signs its webhooks with HMAC: those are signatures on a delivery. Poppy, PACT and Shopify/shop each state in writing what their own record does not prove. A confirmation to the consumer on a durable medium is not found in the Poppy specification and operations pages, the PACT specification page or the Shopify/shop README, SKILL.md and transactions.md (2026-10-13). Seam S4

Entries verified up to 2026-10-15; pages generated on 2026-10-16 from commit 1cb6133.

Graph of the seams | All overlaps | Both graphs on one page | Seams | Calendar | map.json | calendar.ics | map-bundle.md | For agents and tools

Next on the calendar

Full 60-day calendar: Calendar

Where things stand

OrgItemState (as of)Next dated item
W3CW3C AI Agent Protocol Community GroupActive Community Group (created 2025-05-08); agent identity is DID-method-agnostic (did:wba, did:web, did:webvh) since 2026-08-13. (2026-10-13)-
W3CW3C Agentic Web Working Group (draft charter)Draft charter for a proposed Working Group, in refinement until approx. 2026-11-10 (W3C Team estimate, public-new-work). (2026-10-13)approx. 2026-11-10
W3CW3C DID ResolutionCandidate Recommendation Snapshot 2026-08-06; current Candidate Recommendation Draft 2026-10-01 (also 2026-08-28), which marks the Decentralized Identifier (DID) URL dereferencing feature and sections 5, 6, 8 and 10 as at risk. (2026-10-13)-
W3CW3C TPAC 2026 breakouts on agents (Dublin, 2026-10-26/30)Technical Plenary and Advisory Committee (TPAC) 2026 takes place 2026-10-26 to 2026-10-30 in Dublin (hybrid). (2026-10-14)approx. 2026-10-19
W3CW3C/GS1 Workshop on E-commerce for Humans and AI Agents (Zurich, 8-9 Sep 2026)Workshop held 2026-09-08/09 at Google Zurich, co-organised by W3C and GS1. (2026-10-13)-
IETFIETF AI Preferences (aipref WG)The vocabulary draft is at -08 (2026-09-13 in the datatracker history) and the attach draft was last seen at -05 (2026-08-19). (2026-10-13)2026-10-21
IETFIETF AUDIT (BoF preparation)Charter text under discussion on the audit list and in mirjak/audit-bof-preparation; the BoF request lists "User e-commerce use case" in its proposed agenda (file updated 2026-09-18). (2026-10-13)-
IETFIETF DAWN, Discovery of Agents With Names (proposed WG)Charter 00-10 has been in external review since 2026-10-09, with comments to the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) due by 2026-10-19 and an IESG telechat listed for 2026-10-22; the Working Group (WG) is "Proposed", and the WG Review announcement of 2026-10-09 says "The IESG has not made any determination yet". The Approve ballot on 00-10, read on the datatracker on 2026-10-14, carries the summary "Has enough positions to pass." with one Yes and one No Objection recorded; the charter has not been recorded as approved, and no WG Action announcement for DAWN is found among the ietf-announce messages up to 2026-10-12 (read 2026-10-13). (2026-10-14)2026-10-19
IETFIETF Web Bot Auth (webbotauth WG)Active Working Group (WG), listed for coordination by the draft W3C Agentic Web charter; the first WG draft, draft-ietf-webbotauth-httpsig-protocol-00, was adopted on 2026-09-01, and a two-hour session was requested for IETF 127 on 2026-09-15. (2026-10-13)-
IETFIETF agentproto (Agent Communication Protocols WG)The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) announced on 2026-10-08, 16:55 UTC, "A new IETF WG has been formed in the Applications and Real-Time Area" for Agent Communication Protocols (agentproto), chairs Orie Steele and Leslie Daigle, and names the responsible Area Director. (2026-10-13)2026-12-31
IETFIETF vcon (Virtualized Conversations WG)Active working group in the Applications and Real-Time Area, charter-ietf-vcon-01 approved (last updated 2026-03-18); its core draft, draft-ietf-vcon-vcon-core-04 (Standards Track), is dated 2026-09-07. (2026-10-13)2026-10-22
IETFIndividual IETF drafts on the seller sideThree individual Internet-Drafts on the seller side of agent transactions, none adopted by a Working Group (WG): anders merchant-identity-assertions -01, kavian offering-discovery-protocol -01, hood agtp-merchant-identity (-02, an Independent Submission dated 26 May 2026, Informational, expires 27 November 2026; -00 and -02 read). (2026-10-13)-
GS1GS1-Conformant Resolver Standard 1.2.1Release 1.2.1 ratified August 2026 (standards page and PDF print no day); the archive page on ref.gs1.org lists "Published 19 August 2026". (2026-10-13)-
UN/CEFACTUN Transparency Protocol, Identity ResolverLatest stable version 0.7.0 (GitLab tag of 2026-05-04); the 0.7.0 page says the team "expects to release UNTP version 1.0", without a date. (2026-10-13)-
Other standards bodiesCEN/CENELEC JTC 24 Digital Product Passport standards (EN 18216 to EN 18246)Eight horizontal standards; six cited in the Official Journal of the EU according to the CEN-CENELEC page of 2026-07-15 (page re-read on 2026-10-13, unchanged); the two not cited are EN 18239 and EN 18246, and their status is not read. (2026-10-13)-
AAIFAAIF Agentic Commerce Working GroupCharter approved 2026-05-15; Capability Map being built from contributed inputs. (2026-10-13)-
Linux FoundationA2A protocol, agent discoveryA2A registers /.well-known/agent-card.json for a single AgentCard; proposals for hosts serving several agents (PR #2240, issues #2276 and #2248) were open on 2026-10-13: PR #2240 and issue #2248 have no comment, and issue #2276 has no comment after 2026-10-02. (2026-10-13)-
Linux FoundationAI Catalog (Agent Card Working Group)Pre-v1 specification in "a temporary working repo maintained by the Linux Foundation", governed by a Technical Steering Committee with four initial seats. (2026-10-13)-
Linux FoundationMCP Server Cards (ext-server-card, SEP-2127)Experimental extension of MCP: the README of the extension repository still reads "not an accepted or official MCP extension" (2026-10-13). (2026-10-13)-
Linux Foundationx402Open payment protocol under the x402 Foundation (Linux Foundation): intent announced 2026-04-02; operational launch and completed contribution by Coinbase announced 2026-07-14, with 40 member organisations at launch. (2026-10-13)-
IndependentAgentic Resource Discovery (ARD)Specification v0.91 on main (header "Status: Proposal", dated 2026-08-26; header unchanged and last change to spec/ard.md on 2026-10-12, read 2026-10-13); no tag or release in ard-spec (not found, 2026-10-13); Maintainers decide by majority vote; an Oversight Board (Google, Hugging Face, Microsoft, Amazon, Cisco) is published. (2026-10-13)-
IndependentBrowser vendor positions on WebMCP (WebKit, Mozilla, Chrome, Edge)WebKit position issue #670 closed 2026-06-11 as "position: oppose"; Mozilla #1412 closed 2026-08-05 as "position: neutral". Chrome early preview 2026-02-10; Edge blog of 2026-09-21: implementation "is ready for testing". (2026-10-13)-
Independentschema.org open issues relevant to agents, bookings, product and establishment identityIssues #4824, #4786, #4828, #4774 and #4928 were open on 2026-10-13 (issue #4928, 1 comment, last activity 2026-10-08). (2026-10-13)-
IndustryAgent Payments Protocol (AP2)Open protocol in the GitHub organisation google-agentic-commerce (Apache-2.0); latest release v0.2.0 of 2026-04-28, which "focuses on providing Human Not Present flows"; core specification donated to FIDO. (2026-10-13)-
IndustryAgentic Commerce Protocol (ACP)Specification in beta, maintained by OpenAI and Stripe; MAINTAINERS.md also lists Meta (PR #236 "ADMIN: Add Meta as TSC member", merged 2026-04-24). (2026-10-13)-
IndustryEMV Agentic Payments Framework for Specifications (draft for public feedback)Draft published for feedback on 2026-09-01; the comment period ended on 2026-09-30. (2026-10-13)-
IndustryKYAPay (Skyfire)Individual Internet-Drafts named for the OAuth Working Group (WG) (draft-skyfire-oauth-*); WG stream or adoption: not found on the datatracker, 2026-10-13 (the pages of kyapay-token and using-kyapay-tokens show "(No stream defined)"). (2026-10-13)-
IndustryMastercard Agent PayCommercial programme of Mastercard for agent-initiated payments, described on its framework page (read in a browser on 2026-10-14; first read 2026-10-02). (2026-10-14)-
IndustryPersonal Agent Consent & Trust Protocol (PACT), published by Decagon with InstinctVersion 1.0 of the specification ("This is PACT 1.0.") is published at openpactprotocol.org (the Decagon announcement is dated 2026-10-06), and the repository openpactprotocol/openpactprotocol (created 2026-10-01, Apache-2.0) holds the documentation, a reference Provider, a demo personal agent and conformance tests; its latest commit on main is 838c6bd (2026-10-06, a dependency update), read 2026-10-13. (2026-10-13)-
IndustryPersonal Agent Protocol (PAP, "Poppy"), published by Sierra with MetaDraft 0.1 of the specification is published at personalagentprotocol.org (announced 2026-10-06, draft published 2026-10-09; the pages read on 2026-10-13 are marked "Updated Oct 12, 2026"), under the Apache License 2.0 with the names and the logo excluded; a further 35 design partners were named on 2026-10-09. (2026-10-13)approx. 2026-11-09
IndustryUniversal Commerce Protocol (UCP)Latest GitHub release v2026-08-25 (2026-08-25); lodging booking draft merged 2026-09-24 (PR #780); the Common capability ask merged 2026-10-07 (PR #538); feed and subscription policy in draft (PR #866, PR #890); the food checkout proposal (PR #897) is under review (open on 2026-10-13). (2026-10-14)2026-10-23
IndustryVerifiable IntentDraft v0.1 specification, maintained by Mastercard according to its README (Apache-2.0, tag v0.1.0). (2026-10-13)-
IndustryVisa Trusted Agent Protocol (TAP)Specification and sample code published by Visa under Visa Product Terms of October 10, 2025; the product page, read in a browser on 2026-10-14, still says "This product is in the process of development and deployment." (2026-10-14)-

Payment protocols compared

ProtocolSignaturesReceipt or recordDispute
Agent Payments Protocol (AP2)
Governance: Organisation google-agentic-commerce, Apache-2.0; core specification donated to FIDO (repository); FIDO Payments TWG to develop it
Version: v0.2.0 (2026-04-28), v0.1.0 (2025-09-16); standardisation continues in FIDO working groups
Source: AP2 index.md
What: Mandates (signed Verifiable Digital Credentials): Checkout Mandate (shared with merchant), Payment Mandate (instrument, amount)
Who: Closed mandates: the User (Human Present) or an Agent key (Human Not Present), whose trust "is provided by open Mandates that are signed by the User or a trust list of Agent Providers"; the Merchant provides "a merchant-signed JWT containing the Checkout" (docs/ap2/specification.md, Modes and Checkout Mandate, commit e1ea56d, 2026-10-05); FAQ: "user-signed Checkout Mandate"
Checkout Receipt, returned by the Merchant after accepting or rejecting the Checkout Mandate, with fields status (Success or Error), iss, iat, reference (hash of the closed Mandate) and order_id on Success (checkout_receipt.json); a Mandate Receipt is "a Verifier-signed JWT" (agent_authorization.md); a "signed Payment Receipt" is returned by the Merchant Payment Processor (specification.md); all at commit e1ea56d, 2026-10-05; chained mandates give a verifiable audit trail (docs/index.md)FAQ: in a dispute the network adjudicator can use the user-signed Checkout Mandate; dispute process: "outside the scope of this specification" (docs/ap2/specification.md, section Dispute Evidence, commit e1ea56d, read 2026-10-14)
Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP)
Governance: Governing Council of five (Google, Shopify permanent; three elected); Tech Councils decide by majority; Council charters Domain Working Groups (DWGs)
Version: latest GitHub release v2026-08-25 (2026-08-25); lodging booking draft (PR #780)
What: checkout responses: business signature "proving the terms (price, line items) are authentic"; order webhooks: RFC 9421 signature
Who: business (checkout responses, order webhooks); mandates provided by the platform
Order entity, "the authoritative latest state of the order at the time of retrieval or delivery"not found in the UCP pages read on main (2026-10-03); draft PR #890 only (author commented; see Disclosure)
Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP)
Governance: OpenAI and Stripe maintainers; TSC of up to 7 seats; MAINTAINERS.md lists Meta; PR #236 "ADMIN: Add Meta as TSC member"
Version: Beta; dated versions 2025-09-29 to 2026-04-17 plus an unreleased folder; tag or release: not found in the repository, 2026-10-03 (main unchanged at commit 7fdd78d on 2026-10-14)
What: Signature header on requests (required in delegate_authentication); Merchant-Signature HMAC on webhooks
Who: The request sender; for webhooks, the merchant side
receipt_url, "URL to the order receipt"; signed receipt: not found in specification and RFC files, 2026-10-03 (main unchanged at commit 7fdd78d on 2026-10-14)"dispute" is a post-order adjustment type (unreleased schema); dispute process: not found in specification, RFC files, 2026-10-03 (main unchanged at commit 7fdd78d on 2026-10-14)
x402
Governance: x402 Foundation (Linux Foundation); intent 2026-04-02, operational launch 2026-07-14; TSC.md lists Coinbase, Cloudflare, Stripe
Version: v1 SDK packages marked "Deprecated (v1)"; offer-and-receipt: "Wire shape and field placement are not considered stable"
What: Payer signs the payment (PAYMENT-SIGNATURE); with offer-and-receipt the server commits to the offer terms and signs a receipt
Who: The client for the payment; the server for offer and receipt
Signed receipt (offer-and-receipt), declared use "dispute evidence and auditability"; wire shape not stable"irreversible once executed" (exact scheme, FAQ); auth-capture: void, refund, reclaim; dispute process: not found in the pages read, 2026-10-03; the repository has changed since (head e95b066 on 2026-10-13) and a text search of 2026-10-14 finds the word dispute in 26 files, among them the offer-and-receipt specification and scheme texts, not read for a dispute process
Visa Trusted Agent Protocol (TAP)
Governance: Published by Visa under Visa Product Terms of October 10, 2025; the licence is "conditioned upon You implementing the most current version of the Specification in its entirety" (Product Terms, read in a browser on 2026-10-14)
Version: Product page: "This product is in the process of development and deployment." (read in a browser on 2026-10-14); version number or date on the specifications page: none visible in the saved text (2026-10-14); release: not found, 2026-10-03
What: Three signatures: agent recognition (header, HTTP Message Signatures), signed consumer/device identity, signed payment container
Who: The agent, with a private key; the merchant or site protection provider verifies with the public key from a key store
no record format found in the merchant specification page (read in a browser on 2026-10-14): audit has no match, and receipt appears once, for data a merchant can use "when providing receipt or order updates" to the consumer; sample README: not found, 2026-10-03not found in the merchant specification page (dispute, chargeback, liability: no match, read in a browser on 2026-10-14) and sample README, 2026-10-03
Verifiable Intent
Governance: Maintained by Mastercard (README), "open to multi-stakeholder contribution"; Apache-2.0; contributed to the FIDO Payments Technical Working Group
Version: Draft v0.1; tag v0.1.0; last commit 2026-04-20
What: A delegation chain of SD-JWT credentials carrying mandates and user constraints; checkout-payment integrity binding
Who: Layer 1 credential provider; layer 2 user device key; layer 3 (Autonomous mode) agent key
Tamper-evident record of what the user delegated (README); receipt object: not found in README, design rationale, 2026-10-02Dispute resolution is declared out of scope in the README
EMV Agentic Payments Framework for Specifications (draft for public feedback)
Governance: EMVCo, Agentic Payments Task Force; collaboration with FIDO Alliance, OpenID Foundation, OpenWallet Foundation and W3C
Version: Framework for Specifications v1.0 DRAFT; comment period ended 2026-09-30
What: not assessed: the public-feedback draft was not read; press release and Insights article only (2026-10-02)
Who: not assessed: the public-feedback draft was not read; press release and Insights article only (2026-10-02)
Intent Services register, reference, retrieve and manage consumer-authorised intent (press release); draft not readnot assessed: the public-feedback draft was not read; press release and Insights article only (2026-10-02)

Start here

If you wantGo to
The cross-venue pictureSeams S1 to S4
How the payment protocols comparePayment protocols compared
Where each venue stands, in one tableStatus
Everything in one filemap-bundle.md
The site, one page per venuefrmoretto.github.io/agentic-standards-map
One venue in detailentries/

How the map is built

Inclusion, entry format and source classes are described in full in METHOD.md.

About the author

Francesco Marinoni Moretto, independent researcher on agentic commerce, Milan.

ORCID 0009-0004-0096-4712 · GitHub frmoretto · LinkedIn francesco-moretto

I have taken part in some of the venues mapped; the Disclosure lists where, and the entries concerned say so.

Corrections and missing sources: open an issue on the repository.

How to cite

Marinoni Moretto, F. (2026). Agentic Standards Map (Version 1.0.1) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23377309
Please cite the entry id, the date it was read and the DOI. To cite the map in general, use https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23357361.

Contributing

Corrections and additions based on public sources are welcome: see CONTRIBUTING.md. Each change is dated.

Licence

Content (entries, notes, MAP.md, map.json, the per-entry JSON files, map-bundle.md): CC BY 4.0. Code (tools/): MIT. Quotations from third-party texts remain under their own terms; CC BY 4.0 applies to the author's text and data.

All entries

W3C

IETF

GS1

UN/CEFACT

Other standards bodies

AAIF

Linux Foundation

Independent

Industry